Thursday, March 28, 2019

Disney's deal for Fox will be successful if it persuades investors to value it like Netflix

Disney's $71 billion deal for the majority of 21st Century Fox's entertainment assets has closed. It will take years to judge whether Disney CEO Bob Iger spent his company's money wisely, but the benchmark for success should be clear -- make Disney look and trade like Netflix.

Iger has been pretty clear about why he was willing to break the bank for Fox -- a deal that cost him nearly $20 billion more than he originally planned to spend, after Comcast topped Disney's initial bid. Disney is building a direct-to-consumer streaming service called Disney+, and Iger wants Fox's content, which includes series like "The Simpsons," "Modern Family," and the X-Men and Fantastic Four characters.

Tweet

"Our acquisition of 21st Century Fox was driven by our strong belief that the addition of these great businesses, brands, franchises and talent will allow us to move faster, reach farther and aim higher – especially when it comes to building direct connections with consumers," Iger wrote in a note to employees Wednesday that was shared with CNBC.

If you can't beat Netflix...

Iger is betting on the streaming service because investors have already declared Netflix victorious in its fight against traditional media companies.

Just this week, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings reiterated that his company is more of a media company than a technology company.

And yet, Netflix has a forward price-to-earnings ratio of nearly 57 and an enterprise value-to-trailing EBITDA ratio of about 97.

Those numbers are important because they're two good indicators of how investors value Netflix. Comparable companies should have similar valuation metrics.

Disney's forward P/E ratio is 15. Its enterprise value/EBITDA ratio is 11. That's a lot lower than Netflix.

Disney's business will never be directly comparable to Netflix. It owns an enormous theme park business. It makes hundreds of millions each year in merchandise. Its legacy media business, driven by ESPN, has a completely different business model than streaming licensed and original content.

But as the disparity in those ratios show, investors have largely snubbed Disney in favor of Netflix. Disney shares have risen 15 percent in the last three years. Netflix is up 258 percent in the same period.

So Disney is going all-in on playing Netflix's game. Iger is pulling all of Disney's films from Netflix in the coming year so they exclusively live on Disney+, which will debut later this year. Disney now has Fox's production assets and library content as another streaming option that can compete for consumers' time and dollars against Netflix, Amazon's Prime Video, AT&T's WarnerMedia streaming services, and so many others.

Typically, the process of ascertaining whether not an acquisition "worked" is complicated and more art than science. But in this case, if Disney's new streaming service vaults the company's trading multiple to something that looks more like Netflix and less like Viacom, you can deem its acquisition of Fox a success.

And if it doesn't? Iger's successor will have to figure out company's next transition plan.

Disclosure: CNBC's parent company NBCUniversal is owned by Comcast.

WATCH: Jim Cramer says the Disney/Fox deal could boost Disney stock

show chapters Jim Cramer: The Disney/Fox deal could boost Disney stock Jim Cramer: The Disney/Fox deal could boost Disney stock    4 Hours Ago | 01:28

Monday, March 25, 2019

Levi Strauss Starts Trading And Surges By Over 35% Above IPO Price

&l;p&g;&l;img class=&q;dam-image getty size-large wp-image-545453252&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/545453252/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;667&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; Helston, United Kingdom - July8, 2016: Close-up image of Levi&s;s branding label. Levi Strauss is one of the world&s;s oldest and most well known jeans manufacturers.

Levi Strauss started trading again in the U.S. after&a;nbsp;a 34-year hiatus. The new ticker is LEVI and it is trading on the New York Stock Exchange. The company was founded in San Francisco during the gold rush back in the 1800&s;s. At the time, a tremendous amount of people were moving to California in the hopes of finding gold. People needed durable clothes that could withstand the wear and tear of digging/mining for gold and Levis saw the opportunity and quickly filled that void. Then, in the 1900&s;s the company enjoyed explosive growth as more and more people around the globe began wearing jeans and they became fashionable. Now the company is well positioned for future growth and has diversified its portfolio into other lucrative avenues.

&l;strong&g;10x Oversubscribed:&l;/strong&g;

The current IPO shows that investors have a strong appetite for the stock. The IPO was ten times oversubscribed and the company raised $623 million. The initial public offering was priced at $17 per share, higher than the initial expected range of $14 to $16, valuing the company at $6.6 billion. The fact that it was oversubscribed bodes well for the IPO market as there are several other high-profile IPOs expected to be announced later this year. A few hours after Thursday&s;s open, the stock jumped above $23/share which is over 35% above the IPO price. Clearly, that illustrates strong demand from investors.

&l;strong&g;Competitors Tank:&l;/strong&g;

The key now will be to see how Levis will perform going forward. Earlier today, shares of Guess? Incorporated plunged 15% after reporting lousy earnings. Other retail and apparel stocks have been under pressure in recent years due to the changing landscape. This is just something to keep in mind as we wait and see how the stock will perform going forward.

&l;strong&g;Bottom Line:&l;/strong&g;

This is a big IPO and bodes well for the entire IPO market. At this point, investors want to see if the company can produce strong numbers in future quarters even as other retail and apparel stocks have been under pressure recently.&l;/p&g;

Thursday, March 21, 2019

Top Medical Stocks For 2019

tags:PTNR,RCON,PSK,NLY,FLO,

IDEXX Laboratories (NASDAQ: IDXX) and Nymox Pharmaceutical (NASDAQ:NYMX) are both medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

Get IDEXX Laboratories alerts:

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and target prices for IDEXX Laboratories and Nymox Pharmaceutical, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score IDEXX Laboratories 1 0 6 0 2.71 Nymox Pharmaceutical 0 0 0 0 N/A

IDEXX Laboratories currently has a consensus price target of $222.83, suggesting a potential downside of 5.75%. Given IDEXX Laboratories’ higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe IDEXX Laboratories is more favorable than Nymox Pharmaceutical.

Top Medical Stocks For 2019: Partner Communications Company Ltd.(PTNR)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Deutsche Telekom (OTCMKTS: DTEGY) and Partner Communications (NASDAQ:PTNR) are both utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability and risk.

  • [By Money Morning News Team]

    Partner Communications Co. Ltd. (Nasdaq: PTNR) is an Israeli-based mobile network operator, as well as an Internet and telephone provider. Founded in 1999, Partner was formerly operating under the umbrella of the French telecommunications company "Orange" until 2016.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Partner Communications (NASDAQ: PTNR) and Deutsche Telekom (OTCMKTS:DTEGY) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability, risk and dividends.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Partner Communications (NASDAQ: PTNR) and Hutchison Telecommunications Hong Kong (OTCMKTS:HTHKY) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

Top Medical Stocks For 2019: Recon Technology, Ltd.(RCON)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Media coverage about Recon Technology (NASDAQ:RCON) has been trending positive recently, Accern Sentiment reports. The research firm rates the sentiment of media coverage by reviewing more than twenty million blog and news sources. Accern ranks coverage of companies on a scale of -1 to 1, with scores nearest to one being the most favorable. Recon Technology earned a media sentiment score of 0.27 on Accern’s scale. Accern also assigned media headlines about the oil and gas company an impact score of 44.9374991541436 out of 100, meaning that recent media coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an effect on the stock’s share price in the immediate future.

Top Medical Stocks For 2019: SPDR Wells Fargo Preferred Stock ETF (PSK)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    PrairieSky Royalty (TSE:PSK)’s share price reached a new 52-week high during mid-day trading on Monday . The company traded as high as C$28.50 and last traded at C$28.40, with a volume of 395241 shares changing hands. The stock had previously closed at C$28.32.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    SPDR Wells Fargo Preferred Stock ETF (NYSEARCA:PSK) announced a monthly dividend on Monday, September 3rd, Wall Street Journal reports. Investors of record on Wednesday, September 5th will be given a dividend of 0.20 per share on Monday, September 10th. This represents a $2.40 annualized dividend and a dividend yield of 5.51%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Tuesday, September 4th.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    PrairieSky Royalty Ltd (TSE:PSK) has earned a consensus recommendation of “Buy” from the twelve brokerages that are covering the stock, MarketBeat reports. Three investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and four have assigned a buy rating to the company. The average twelve-month price target among brokerages that have issued a report on the stock in the last year is C$32.99.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    LPL Financial LLC decreased its position in shares of SPDR Wells Fargo Preferred Stock ETF (NYSEARCA:PSK) by 23.2% in the 1st quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the SEC. The firm owned 138,573 shares of the company’s stock after selling 41,937 shares during the quarter. LPL Financial LLC’s holdings in SPDR Wells Fargo Preferred Stock ETF were worth $6,021,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

Top Medical Stocks For 2019: Annaly Capital Management Inc(NLY)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    ANNALY Cap Mgmt/SH (NYSE:NLY) was the target of a significant increase in short interest during the month of July. As of July 31st, there was short interest totalling 37,569,172 shares, an increase of 19.8% from the July 13th total of 31,358,349 shares. Approximately 3.3% of the company’s stock are sold short. Based on an average daily trading volume, of 7,349,260 shares, the days-to-cover ratio is currently 5.1 days.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    BRITISH COLUMBIA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Corp cut its holdings in ANNALY Cap Mgmt/SH (NYSE:NLY) by 7.6% during the 1st quarter, according to its most recent disclosure with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 978,335 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock after selling 79,911 shares during the period. BRITISH COLUMBIA INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT Corp owned approximately 0.08% of ANNALY Cap Mgmt/SH worth $10,204,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    West Chester Capital Advisors Inc. decreased its stake in ANNALY CAP MGMT/SH (NYSE:NLY) by 16.1% in the fourth quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The institutional investor owned 47,250 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock after selling 9,066 shares during the quarter. ANNALY CAP MGMT/SH makes up about 1.2% of West Chester Capital Advisors Inc.’s holdings, making the stock its 29th biggest position. West Chester Capital Advisors Inc.’s holdings in ANNALY CAP MGMT/SH were worth $464,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission.

  • [By Dan Caplinger]

    Sometimes, though, you can have too much of a good thing. Dividend stocks with top dividend yields come with special risks, and although that doesn't guarantee that you'll get burned, the chances of a setback are greater. Below, I'll look at BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust (NYSE:BPT), CenturyLink (NYSE:CTL), and Annaly Capital Management (NYSE:NLY) to explain why their yields are so high and what dangers could lurk beneath the surface.

Top Medical Stocks For 2019: Flowers Foods, Inc.(FLO)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Here are some of the headlines that may have effected Accern’s analysis:

    Get Flowers Foods alerts: Analyzing Flowers Foods (FLO) and Hain Celestial Group (HAIN) (americanbankingnews.com) Flowers are suddenly everywhere in food (bendbulletin.com) Berenberg’s Packaged Food Pair Trade: Buy Twinkie’s Parent Company, Hold Flowers Food (finance.yahoo.com) Flowers Foods (FLO) Rating Increased to Outperform at Consumer Edge (americanbankingnews.com) Flowers Foods (FLO) Coverage Initiated at Berenberg Bank (americanbankingnews.com)

    A number of equities research analysts recently weighed in on FLO shares. Zacks Investment Research downgraded shares of Flowers Foods from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Wednesday, April 18th. Deutsche Bank set a $24.00 target price on shares of Flowers Foods and gave the company a “hold” rating in a research note on Tuesday, April 17th. Hilliard Lyons started coverage on shares of Flowers Foods in a research note on Tuesday, April 3rd. They issued a “buy” rating and a $25.00 target price on the stock. KeyCorp started coverage on shares of Flowers Foods in a research note on Tuesday, March 27th. They issued an “overweight” rating and a $24.00 target price on the stock. Finally, Jefferies Group reaffirmed a “hold” rating and issued a $19.00 target price on shares of Flowers Foods in a research note on Thursday, May 17th. One investment analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, seven have given a hold rating, four have given a buy rating and one has assigned a strong buy rating to the stock. The stock currently has a consensus rating of “Hold” and an average target price of $22.00.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    FlorinCoin (CURRENCY:FLO) traded 1.3% lower against the U.S. dollar during the one day period ending at 16:00 PM E.T. on February 6th. One FlorinCoin coin can now be purchased for $0.0524 or 0.00000839 BTC on popular cryptocurrency exchanges including Bittrex and Trade By Trade. Over the last week, FlorinCoin has traded up 67.9% against the U.S. dollar. FlorinCoin has a total market capitalization of $7.63 million and $541,837.00 worth of FlorinCoin was traded on exchanges in the last day.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    FlorinCoin (CURRENCY:FLO) traded 1.3% lower against the US dollar during the one day period ending at 20:00 PM ET on October 7th. One FlorinCoin coin can now be purchased for approximately $0.0524 or 0.00000839 BTC on popular exchanges including Bittrex and Trade By Trade. In the last seven days, FlorinCoin has traded 67.9% higher against the US dollar. FlorinCoin has a total market capitalization of $7.63 million and approximately $541,837.00 worth of FlorinCoin was traded on exchanges in the last 24 hours.

Tuesday, March 19, 2019

Noodles & Co Earnings: NDLS Stock Unmoved, Restaurant Turns Profit

Noodles & Co (NASDAQ:NDLS) unveiled its latest quarterly earnings figures late today, bringing in a profit that missed expectations, but it marked an improvement compared to the restaurant company’s year-ago loss.

Noodles & Co EarningsNoodles & Co EarningsThe fast-casual business, hailing from Broomfield, Co., posted net income of around $19,000 for its fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, topping the loss it compiled during the same period in 2017. On a per-share basis, the company’s profit was less than a penny. When adjusted for asset impairment costs, earnings were up to a penny per share.

This figure was below what Wall Street predicted as Zacks Investment Research called for an adjusted profit of 2 cents per share, according to its survey of three analysts. Noodles & Co’s revenue for its fourth quarter totaled approximately $113.2 million for the period, below the $113.8 million that the Zacks poll of three analysts called for.

For its fiscal 2018, the business minimized its loss as it was down to $8.4 million, or 20 cents per share. The company’s sales reached $457.8 million for the year.

Now that the restaurant company is in the midst of its fiscal 2019, it announced that it foresees a profit of 6 cents to 15 cents per share. Revenue for the year is projected to be roughly $466 million at the midpoint guidance.

NDLS stock is unmoved after the bell. Shares had declined about 1.7% during regular trading hours as Noodles & Co readied its quarterly documentation for public release.

Compare Brokers

Monday, March 18, 2019

Central Intelligence=?UTF-8?Q?=20Agency=20-?= Case #12738496

Case #12738496

Distribution and storage of pornographic electronic materials involving underage children.

   

   

My name is Waldo Spear and I am a technical collection officer working for Central Intelligence Agency.

   

It has come to my attention that your personal details including your email address (intotopstock.financial@blogger.com) are listed in case #12738496.

   

The following details are listed in the document's attachment:

   

  • Your personal details,
  • Home address,
  • Work address,
  • List of relatives and their contact information.

   

   

Case #12738496 is part of a large international operation set to arrest more than 2000 individuals suspected of paedophilia in 27 countries.

   

The data which could be used to acquire your personal information:

   

  • Your ISP web browsing history,
  • DNS queries history and connection logs,
  • Deep web .onion browsing and/or connection sharing,
  • Online chat-room logs,
  • Social media activity log.

   

The first arrests are scheduled for April 8, 2019.

   

Why am I contacting you ?

   

I read the documentation and I know you are a wealthy person who may be concerned about reputation.

   

I am one of several people who have access to those documents and I have enough security clearance to amend and remove your details from this case. Here is my proposition.

   

Transfer exactly $10,000 USD (ten thousand dollars - about 2.5 BTC) through Bitcoin network to this special bitcoin address:

   

3KXyrPYTXfVJjc3wBbxnYSex5jfzM8WGxT

   

You can transfer funds with online bitcoin exchanges such as Coinbase, Bitstamp or Coinmama. The deadline is March 27, 2019 (I need few days to access and edit the files).

   

Upon confirming your transfer I will take care of all the files linked to you and you can rest assured no one will bother you.

   

Please do not contact me. I will contact you and confirm only when I see the valid transfer.

   

Regards,

Waldo Spear

   

Technical Collection Officer

Directorate of Science and Technology

Central Intelligence Agency

Friday, March 15, 2019

EP Energy Corp (EPE) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

EP Energy Corp  (NYSE:EPE)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallMarch 15, 2019, 10:00 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good morning and welcome to EP Energy's Fourth Quarter and Year End 2018 Results Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. (Operator Instructions) Please also note, today's event is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Jordan Strauss. Sir, please go ahead.

Jordan Strauss -- Investor and Media Relations

Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us today for EP Energy's fourth quarter and year end 2018 financial and operational results conference call. I hope you've had a chance to review the earnings release and the supplemental presentation we published yesterday. The earnings release and presentation are available in the Investors Section of our website at epenergy.com. Also, please note, we intend to communicate our key points on this call today and will not be hosting the Q&A session.

I'd like to remind everyone that on today's call we'll discuss forward-looking statements and certain non-GAAP financial measures. We encourage everyone to read our full disclosure on forward-looking statements and GAAP reconciliations, which can be found at the end of the Company's earnings release and our documents on file with the SEC. These documents are also available on our website.

Joining me on the call this morning are EP Energy's President and Chief Executive Officer, Russell Parker; and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Kyle McCuen.

And with that, I'll turn the call over to Russell.

Russell E. Parker -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Jordan, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining the call and your continued interest in EP Energy. For today's agenda, I'm going to start by reviewing a summary of our 2018 results and performance of our asset program. Kyle will then go through some of the key financial results and discuss our 2019 outlook. We also plan to do something a little different than previous calls and refer to certain slides to make sure that key points we want to make about each slide or understood. But before we get into the slides, I'd like to make a few remarks to explain how we adapted to this volatile commodity price cycle that came about in the second half of 2018. We've been maintaining a lower net completion count per month during the fourth and first quarters compared to prior period. We've also been utilizing our existing drilling rig fleet to build our DUC inventory, such that the company can quickly take advantage of commodity price changes in the future.

With all that said, there are few things we will not change. We will maintain our focus on capital efficiency, building off of the successes and completion design improvements seen in 2018, as well as expanding our horizontal program in Northeastern Utah. To that end, Slide 5 and 6 highlight how we delivered on driving down LOE and Cash G&A, while maintaining production flat from 2017. We refreshed the Northeastern Utah as horizontal cumulative oil production chart again this quarter. On Slide 7, you can see these two horizontals are still performing quite strongly. We expect to complete two more Northeastern Utah horizontal wells in the first quarter of 2019.

As seen on Slides 8 and 9 of the posted materials, the 2018 design wells continued to drive revenue per investment outperformance of the historical offset in both the Eagle Ford and in the Permian. In addition, we will continue to drive down costs, make continued progress and liability management, and maintain liquidity as we operate throughout 2019. Given the dynamic changes to the commodities market over the past several months, we find it necessary to operate and respond in a dynamic fashion. And as such, we will be issuing guidance on a quarter by quarter basis.

With that overview, I'll hand it off to Kyle for some more details on our financial results. Kyle?

Kyle A. McCuen -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Russell, and good morning, everyone. Today I will highlight a few items for the quarter. During the quarter we recorded a $1.1 billion non-cash impairment to our Permian asset. The writedown is a result of significant reduction in assumed Permian activity in our five-year plan, as a result of the downturn in oil prices since Q3 2018, and a shift toward basing pricing advantage and more lucrative Eagle Ford in Northeastern Utah projects. In conjunction with this change, we eliminated all Permian-related PUD reserves in our 2018 reserve report.

We reported a year-end oil and gas reserve estimate of 325 million barrels of oil equivalent. We retained Ryder Scott for the first time this year to prepare a reserve estimate instead of audit -- instead of auditing an internally developed estimate. Due to the downturn in oil prices since Q3 2018 and the projected impact on our future liquidity, we shortened the PUD development time frame and our year end reserve estimate from the SEC's five year maximum time frame to a three year time frame. We don't expect the reduction in PUD reserves to have a negative impact on our RBL commitments.

As Russell mentioned, we aim to make continued progress on liability management and continued to actively evaluate options to improve our balance sheet. We bought back $133 million of face value debt at a discount -- at discounted prices since early 2018. The balance on the May 2020 maturity is now $182 million, and we continue to look at all liability management options to address this and other near-term debt maturities.

On Slide 10 you can see our hedge book as of March 12. We have added crude oil hedges since the last earnings call, principally in 2020, where we now have price protection. We now have approximately 12 million barrels hedged with a floor price of approximately $56 with upside to $65.

Slide 11 provides our first quarter 2019 guidance. During the quarter, we moved from four rigs in the Eagle Ford to three rigs, and from two rigs in Northeastern Utah to one that is focused on horizontal drilling only. We have lowered our completions and thus you see a slight uptick in our per unit metrics due to the lower volumes. As always, we will continue to manage the business in a cost efficient manner.

In regards to the NYSE non-compliance notice, we continue to evaluate all options. As disclosed in an 8-K in January, if we are unable to get back into compliance by the end of the six-month cure period that ends in July, the NYSE will commence the listing procedures.

With that, I'll turn it back over to Russell to wrap up. Russell?

Russell E. Parker -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Kyle. I want to wrap up the call with a few closing comments. As you can see on Slide 4, the material 2018 was a year of solid execution from the new management team. We're very pleased with what we accomplished during the year. We improved capital efficiency in all basins, drilled and completed our first ever horizontal wells in Northeastern Utah, drilled our most productive Eagle Ford wells in the program history, expanded our Eagle Ford footprint and significantly improved our cost structure. In addition, 2018 was the only year in Company history in which EBITDA was significantly larger than capital spent over the same period without the benefit of hedge settlements. We have a great set of assets and a committed group of exceptional employees that helped us deliver on our operating objectives. We're uncertain in how long the current price conditions will last, however, we plan to stay disciplined, to continue to improve our capital efficiency, continue to improve our cost structure, continue to improve our portfolio mix, and continue to strengthen our financial profile in order to position the Company for success.

Thank you for your time and attention this morning. We'll now close the earnings call. Thank you.

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, the conference has concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your line.

Duration: 08 minutes

Call participants:

Jordan Strauss -- Investor and Media Relations

Russell E. Parker -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Kyle A. McCuen -- Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

More EPE analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Thursday, March 14, 2019

Tilly's Inc (TLYS) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Tilly's Inc  (NYSE:TLYS)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallMarch 14, 2019, 4:30 p.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Ladies and gentlemen, greetings and welcome to Tilly's, Inc. Fourth Quarter Fiscal 2018 Earnings Results Conference Call. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this program is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Gar Jackson of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Gar Jackson -- Investor Relations

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the Tilly's fiscal 2018 fourth quarter earnings call. Ed Thomas, President and CEO and Michael Henry, CFO will discuss the Company's results and then host a Q&A session.

For a copy of Tilly's earnings press release, which includes reconciliations of GAAP-based financial measures to certain non-GAAP financial measures that will be discussed during this call, please visit the Investor Relations section of the Company's website at tillys.com. From the same section, shortly after the conclusion of the call, you will also be able to find a recorded replay of this call for the next 30 days.

Certain forward-looking statements will be made during this call that reflect Tilly's judgment and analysis only as of today, March 14, 2019, and actual results may differ materially from current expectations based on a number of factors affecting Tilly's business.

Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. For a more thorough discussion of the risks and uncertainties associated with any forward-looking statements, please see the disclaimer regarding forward looking statements that is included in our fiscal 2018 fourth quarter earnings release, which is furnished to the SEC today on Form 8-K, as well as our other filings with the SEC referenced in that disclaimer.

Today's call will be limited to one hour and will include a Q&A session after our prepared remarks. I will now turn the call over to Ed.

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Gar, and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. Tilly's continued its positive momentum by posting its strongest quarterly comp result since Q3 of fiscal 2011 and its strongest consecutive three quarter run of comp store sales results since becoming a public company in early 2012. Our fourth quarter comp sales increase of 6.4%, which includes e-commerce and earnings per share of $0.29, were both above our original outlook ranges, which estimated a 2% to 5% comp store sales increase and earnings per share of $0.22 to $0.26.

E-comm sales increased 49.6%, representing our strongest e-comm comp result since Q4 of fiscal 2010. Even when considering last year's fourth quarter e-comm sales decline of 12%, associated with our omni-channel system transitions, our combined two-year fourth quarter e-comm comp of 37.6% still represents our best single quarter e-comm comp result since Q1 of fiscal 2011.

Comp sales in stores decreased 0.9% compared to being up 2.3% in last year's fourth quarter. These fourth quarter results were largely driven by strength of multi-branded assortment. Footwear was particularly strong with a 20% increase over last year. Men's posted a high-single-digit percentage sales increase, driven mostly by branded graphic tees. Boys, women's and accessories were also positive. Girls was down high-single digits, primarily due to certain fashion trends that worked in women's, but did not work well in girls.

Turning to fiscal 2019, as we announced prior to the ICR Conference in January, we currently anticipate to open approximately 10 to 15 new store -- full-size stores for the year. As we have stated previously, we will only open new stores, if we are able to obtain what we believe are appropriate lease economics.

Generally speaking, mall traffic is still down according to every industry report we read, and retailers are still closing stores, lease economics need to reflect that reality. We remain very selective in our approach to new store openings and will only open new stores that we project to be accretive to our bottom line.

As for RSQ pop-up shop, we continue to evaluate opportunities to add more of them, but do not have any specific plans to do so now. We just recently closed our first RSQ pop-up in Dallas upon initial lease expiration at the end of February, leaving us with three remaining.

In terms of marketing, we recently hired a new VP of marketing, who brings tremendous branding experience to us with her 16 years of experience at Mattel. Under her leadership, we will aim to drive greater brand awareness and continue to find creative ways to drive store traffic, enthusiasm and loyalty for the Tilly's business.

We are also excited to announce the launch of our new partnership with the High School Esports League. This league is the largest Esports league at the high school level, encompassing approximately 1,200 schools nationwide. We are donating an Esports academic scholarship and conducting a two-week, all store augmented reality event this spring that will include a number of exciting prizes. Esports are growing at a tremendous rate, particularly among some of our key target demographics. And we believe Tilly's is well positioned to support this emerging and highly popular activity, while also driving additional customer engagement for us.

Another key focus for us in fiscal 2019 is to continue to improve our customer-facing technologies. Among the priorities for this year are the launch of an expanded loyalty program and enhanced mobile app, a buy now, pay later program, same day delivery from selected stores and a ship-to-store program. Specific launch timing of several of these items is still being determined, but each of these efforts aims to strengthen customer engagement and convenience, and to drive further improvement in our business.

In closing, we continue to deliver solid operating performance as evidenced by our best three quarter run of comp sales in seven years. For the third consecutive year, we also paid a special cash dividend in February. Although the first quarter is off to a soft start, we believe this is largely attributable to the later Easter this year and the unseasonably cold weather across much of the country, particularly in our home state of California, where 95 of our 228 total stores reside, which has resulted in weak sales across all spring categories. We believe our business will improve as we get close to the Easter and into warmer weather patterns that are more aligned with our spring assortment, which should allow us to deliver a positive comp for the quarter.

Now, I will turn the call over to Mike to provide more details on our fiscal 2018 fourth quarter operating performance and to introduce our fiscal 2019 first quarter earnings outlook. Mike?

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

Thanks, Ed. Good afternoon, everyone. The following commentary will compare our fourth quarter operating results for this year's 13-week period ended February 2, 2019 versus last year's 14-week period ended February 3, 2018.

Total net sales of $170.6 million, increased by $6.3 million or 3.8% from $164.3 million last year, despite the fact that last year's extra week contributed approximately $7.1 million to last year's total net sales. Total comparable store net sales for this year's 13-week period increased 6.4% compared to flat total comp sales for last year's 14-week period.

E-comm sales increased 49.6% and represented approximately 20% of our total net sales this year, compared to a 12% decrease and a 14% share of our total net sales last year. Store comps decreased 0.9% and represented approximately 80% of our total net sales this year, compared to an increase of 2.3% and an 86% share of our total net sales last year. We ended fiscal 2018 with 229 total stores, including four RSQ-branded pop-up stores compared to 219 full-size stores at the end of fiscal 2017.

Gross profit, including buying distribution and occupancy expenses, was $52.2 million or 30.6% of net sales, compared to last year's $51.4 million or 31.3% of net sales. The 70 basis point decline in gross margin was due to a $2.4 million increase in distribution costs, primarily resulting from higher e-comm shipping expenses associated with our strong e-comm net sales growth.

Total occupancy costs increased by approximately $0.5 million due to having 10 net new stores this year, but these costs improved by 20 basis points as a percentage of net sales due to achieving higher total net sales.

Product margins improved by 20 basis points, primarily due to lower markdowns, partially offset by lower initial markups attributable to a product mix shift toward branded merchandise.

Regarding the legal settlement coupons, we issued in early September 2018, less than 1.5% of the total coupons issued had been redeemed to date. Redemption transactions have represented less than 0.2% of total transactions and less than 0.5% of total net sales, resulting in no material impact on our comp sales or operating results. While there can be no guarantee that redemption activity will remain immaterial prior to coupon expiration on September 4 of this year, we are not expecting any meaningful impacts to our business during the final six months of the redemption period.

Total SG&A expenses were $41.2 million or 24.2% of net sales, compared to $40 million or 24.3% of net sales last year. Although SG&A increased by $1.2 million, it leveraged due to our achieving (ph) higher total sales. The primary SG&A dollar increase was from higher corporate bonus provisions of approximately $1.1 million associated with improved operating results for the year. SG&A also includes approximately $0.9 million of expense reductions from the negotiated resolution of certain vendor disputes.

Operating income was $10.9 million or 6.4% of net sales, compared to $11.4 million or 7% of net sales last year, primarily due to last year's extra week of sales noted earlier, which helped leverage our relatively fixed expense base last year.

Income tax expense was $3.1 million or 26.4% of pre-tax income, compared to $5.2 million or 43.5% of pre-tax income last year. The reduction in tax rate was primarily due to the new corporate tax rates enacted in 2018.

Net income was $8.7 million or $0.29 per diluted share, compared to $6.7 million or $0.23 per diluted share last year. This year's EPS included a benefit of $0.02 from the negotiated expense reductions noted earlier. Weighted average diluted shares for the quarter were 29.8 million versus 29.5 million last year.

Turning to our balance sheet. We ended the quarter with cash and marketable securities, totaling $144.1 million and no debt compared to $136 million and no debt at the end of fiscal 2017. In February 2019, we paid a special dividend to stockholders for the third consecutive year, totaling approximately $29.5 million in the aggregate or $1 per share. Our 6.4% comp sales increase exceeded inventory per square growth of 2.7%, and we ended the quarter with a more current inventory aging compared to last year at this time.

Total capital expenditures for fiscal 2018 were $14.9 million compared to $13.8 million last year.

Now, turning to our outlook for the first quarter of fiscal 2019. Based on current and historical trends, particularly for years in which Easter occurred later in the year, as is the case for this year, we are expecting total net sales to range from approximately $128 million to $130 million based on a low-single-digit percentage increase in comparable store net sales. As Ed noted earlier, the first quarter is off to a slow start, which we believe is due to unseasonably cold and wet weather, particularly here in California, where 95 of our total stores reside.

Total comps are down low-single digits thus far in the first quarter, although we did have our first positive comp week of the quarter last week. With a later Easter this year, sales are expected to be more back-end weighted for the quarter and we believe we can still deliver a positive comp for the quarter.

Based on an anticipated continuation of the product mix shift toward branded merchandise and strong e-comm net sales growth with attendant costs, we expect pre-tax operating results to range from a loss of approximately $0.4 million to income of approximately $1.2 million and earnings per share to range from a loss of $0.01 to income of $0.03.

This outlook assumes no non-cash store asset impairment charges, an effective income tax rate of approximately 27% and weighted average diluted shares of approximately 30 million. We expect inventories per square foot to remain flat to slightly up versus last year's levels.

In terms of new store openings for fiscal 2019, we expect one store to open near the end of the first quarter and another in the middle of the second quarter. We currently have nine additional unsigned new stores in negotiation for this year. We anticipate any additional openings will most likely occur in-between the back to school and holiday seasons at this time.

Operator, we will now take questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you. (Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from the line of Dave King with ROTH Capital. You are now live.

David M. King -- ROTH Capital Partners -- Analyst

Thanks. Afternoon, guys.

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Hi.

David M. King -- ROTH Capital Partners -- Analyst

I guess, first on the on the guidance, just curious about some of the items driving the confidence in getting back to a positive comp, I guess what sort of in-store traffic is assumed from here versus the decline, I think, you had in Q4 and then on the e-commerce side, how has that business trended so far in Q1 versus what's sort of embedded in the guidance?

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

Okay. Traffic was actually up just under 1% for the fourth quarter. It's been down so far in the first quarter, but with a later Easter, that's somewhat to be expected. We think traffic will be somewhere around flattish for the quarter by the time all is said and done. Later Easter looking at the last two years where Easter was as late with year 2014 and 2017. The cadence of the quarter relative to where we are now still suggests that we should be able to deliver a positive comp. And that's what's giving us the confidence that we can get there.

We're obviously off to a slow start and that's been -- we've had negative comp in all markets. On the store side, e-comm is up 25% quarter to date so far. We would actually expect e-comm to be up stronger than that by the time the quarter is over. Those are the factors that go into, if I missed anything, let me know.

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah and then just to add to what Mike said. We can clearly say in terms of performance that the categories are the softest for us. A very seasonal category is warmer weather-related like shorts and swim. So we know -- we've seen a little -- where we've seen a little bit of pop up of warmer weather, those categories have performed better. So that's kind of where we're at.

David M. King -- ROTH Capital Partners -- Analyst

Okay, perfect. And then just a clarification on that improvement in e-comm from the 25%, I assume and that's some of those same category things, but also the timing of Easter that you think will help to reaccelerate e-comm?

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah.

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. Same dynamic. Even though e-comm is up right now, the same dynamic of spring category is being down versus winter products being up applies.

David M. King -- ROTH Capital Partners -- Analyst

Okay, perfect. And then maybe switching gears on the 120 basis point increase in distribution costs, how much of that was related to shipping? And then I guess just on overall gross margin, to what extent did the increase branded mix or higher IMUs way versus maybe better full-price business through e-comm maybe helping to offset that? Thank you.

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. So the e-comm shipping in particular was the great majority of that 120 basis point increase in distribution costs, along with some other fulfillment-related costs that go through the distribution line. On product margins, IMUs were down about 30 basis points, but that was offset by lower total markdowns, given that we had cleaner inventory as we finished the year. We also got a little bit of favorability in the margin line from when we've completed our year-end physical inventories. We got a little bit of shrink favorability out of that. And then again, just lower markdowns on cleaner inventory.

David M. King -- ROTH Capital Partners -- Analyst

And the full-price business for e-comm that --?

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

It was quite healthy.

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Mostly gotten better.

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, that's right. The e-comm comp was not purely a clearance-driven mechanism, nor has it been so far in the first quarter. So we're actually pleased with what we're seeing in reg price business. We just do have the challenge of the seasonal issue right now.

David M. King -- ROTH Capital Partners -- Analyst

Perfect. All right. Thanks for taking all my questions.

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of David Buckley with Bank of America Merrill Lynch. You are now live.

David Buckley -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question. How should we think about e-comm growth rate this year? What percentage of your total business do you think it can grow to and then in the fourth quarter, how big was the branded penetration versus historic levels and how do you see that growing this year? Thank you.

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

I'll start with the answer to e-comm. I'm expecting it to be double-digit growth about for the year for sure. How fast it accelerates? I mean, we've claimed that most of the issues we experienced last year in the fourth quarter related to omni-channel, and that's helped us optimize our inventory as it relates to e-comm sales. And, we're seeing enough positive signs there and momentum where we expect it to continue very strong.

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah, and then on the branded penetration, for the fourth quarter, branded was a little more than 200 basis points higher in penetration than it was a year ago. So fourth quarter in particular, branded was 76% of the business versus just under 74% of the business for fourth quarter last year. And then for the year as a whole, it moved from 26 to 25 proprietary -- sorry moved from 26% to 25% on full year basis.

David Buckley -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Jeff Van Sinderen from B.Riley FBR. You are now live.

Jeff Van Sinderen -- B.Riley & Company, Inc. -- Analyst

Thanks for taking my question. Just on the mix shift of branded. I'm just wondering, is there something going on that you think would change that or do you expect us to continue to shift or gear a little bit more toward branded beyond Q1, I guess? And also, how should we think about merch margin around that?

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

I don't think -- I wouldn't expect it to shift materially one way or the other from -- we've been pretty consistent over the years of maintaining the -- our proprietary merchandise mix as a percent of -- percentage of sales versus branded. Sometimes, there might be a brand that emerges as a really hot brand that might skew that mix a little, but there is nothing strategically that we're doing differently in terms of brands versus private label.

Jeff Van Sinderen -- B.Riley & Company, Inc. -- Analyst

And then with some of the other retail liquidations out there, I'm just wondering how you're thinking about overall proprietary, Tilly's branded merchandise and if we should read anything in to your comments on the RSQ pop-ups, it just would seem to me like maybe there's an opportunity for you to gain some market share with some of the closures out there?

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. Well, clearly there's no shortage of real estate, that's for sure. And I think over time with -- a lot of the closures we've seen more -- like a Charlotte Russe, I'm hoping over time, we'll pick up some market share in the women's segment, which is an area of opportunity for us for sure. But I'm not expecting any -- it's still a moving target in terms of how many stores are going to close and who is closing and I think the days of retail reorganizations are pretty much done. So I think -- I don't think we'll see a lot of these companies come back other than maybe online-only business. So I see it as an opportunity, but there's going to be a gradual pickup of market share, and it's not going to happen overnight.

Jeff Van Sinderen -- B.Riley & Company, Inc. -- Analyst

Right. Do you think that the landlords are starting to get it? I mean, with all the real estate that's out there that's vacant. I mean, obviously something has to go in there. They wanted to be leased. They don't want it to be dark. I'm just wondering what your latest thought is, I guess, on the real estate situation. Are you getting fair terms on renewals? And how are you thinking about the stores coming up for decision this year?

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, I think we've seen improvement in it for sure. Is it as good as -- is it as good as what I want it to be? Not yet, but it's -- we've definitely seen progress from negotiations with landlords. And I think you know me well enough, Jeff, because I don't like to pay rent. So I mean -- it's definitely better and we've had -- we have good working relationships with the major landlords and we've had pretty good progress. So I think the challenge now is, particularly in malls versus outlet (ph) is, what are the landlords going to do to fill up the space?

And there's not a lot of new emerging growth retailers out there that can take that space. So we have that we to -- we have very -- in addition to economics, we're very careful about where we're going -- where we're going even within the property, where we're going to make sure that the co-tenancy is going to be good around us.

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

And we still have a lot of flexibility coming, lot of decisions to be made, we'll have roughly 75 decisions that we have to make this year in 2019 and then over the course of the following two years, I think the latest number is 65 or 66 more to make over 2020 and 2021. So that's a 140 of our total 228 stores that are going to have to be addressed one way or another and we're certainly going to keep fighting for every inch we can gain.

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

The good thing is that, we have so much flexibility with our leases in turn we try and kick out clauses and it gives us a lot of flexibility in terms of what we can do, if the economics are not right and so on and so forth. So we -- real estate portfolio is in pretty good shape because of that.

Jeff Van Sinderen -- B.Riley & Company, Inc. -- Analyst

Okay, good to hear. And then one more, if I could just throw it in. Is there any change on your thinking around the longer-term target of getting to high-single-digit operating margin?

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

No, that hasn't changed at all. Sorry, I was writing something down as you asked your question. No, that really hasn't changed. For the last couple of years, we had been saying that our -- the year that Ed and I joined was the lowest profit year in the Company's history. And we thought we could get the Company back in the mid-single-digit territory over a reasonable period of time. We've done that each of the last two years. The profitability of the business has improved each of the last three years. This business used to perform at a double-digit rate, certainly pre -- becoming a public company, but it was a lot more productive in terms of topline sales per square foot.

And so we do need stronger topline performance to be able to get there. We can't kind of cut expenses and save our way there. It's got to come from better topline productivity to get there, but we still believe we can do it. We've been improving our under-performing stores over the last actually more than two years running now. Those have continued to improve. And we still think we've got more work to do there and more work that we can achieve. So as long as we can keep driving positive comps, the opportunities are there for us to further improve the profitability of the business.

Jeff Van Sinderen -- B.Riley & Company, Inc. -- Analyst

Okay. Thanks and best of luck for the remainder of Q1.

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

Thanks.

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Jeff.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes the line of Mitch Kummetz from Pivotal Research. You are now live.

Mitch Kummetz -- Pivotal Research Group -- Analyst

Yeah, thanks for taking my questions. So, Mike, you mentioned -- your low-single-digit QTD comp and I think you said negative across regions in the store. It sounds like California is the worst of that. Is there anyway you kind of parse out California versus the rest of the business? I mean, if I had to guess, I'd say California is probably down doubles, but you tell me?

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

No, it's not the absolute worse, but it's not good. All markets were negative. We had three markets that were in low negative double digits. SoCal is down just shy of 10% right now. NorCal is down 8%. So, when we've got 95 of our 228 stores in California and in the aggregate, call it down 9%. That's tough and certainly is part of the hole that we have to dig out of during the remainder of the quarter.

Mitch Kummetz -- Pivotal Research Group -- Analyst

And then you mentioned, I think you said that California was positive comp last week. First, I just wanted to just confirm that that's what you said. And if that's the case --

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

Total business was.

Mitch Kummetz -- Pivotal Research Group -- Analyst

Was it better? I mean, is California still dragging or I guess I'm try to get out is, what's the level of pent-up demand do you think in some of these markets that have been hurt the most by the weather? Are you starting to see that come as the weather turns?

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. Wherever we've seen improvement in weather even it is for one day, we've seen improvement in that business and those markets where it's been down. So I think there's a lot of pent-up demand and I think we'll get our fair share of that once the weather breaks more consistently positive. Okay.

Mitch Kummetz -- Pivotal Research Group -- Analyst

Got it. And then on the Q1 guide, I guess a couple things on the margin. So, I mean, it sounds like you would expect e-commerce to be a lot stronger than stores. I know in the quarter you had just reported that had a negative impact on the gross margin. I think you said 120 basis points because of higher distribution costs. How do you think about that kind of line item in the first quarter as e-comm continues to outpace the stores?

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, I think the biggest challenge is shipping. And the same thing as Mike called out, we're working on a number of things to optimize our inventory and that -- but one of the things we want the first retailers to put in through omni-channel for giving us the ability to ship from the distribution center dedicated to e-comm or stores. So that's worked really well since we fixed the initial issues last year and that's worked really well. Now, what we're working on is trying to improve the initial allocation of inventory between store channel and e-comm channel. And over time that should help us reduce our shipping expenses, but I don't expect it to be any different -- materially different for a while.

David M. King -- ROTH Capital Partners -- Analyst

Yeah, in Q1 in particular to get to the numbers underneath it, it'll be similar in nature to what we saw in Q4. If e-comm is going to stay, call it somewhere 30%, 35% up by the time all is said and done, hopefully store is getting closer to flattish. You might see similar type of relationships as what we just reported for fourth quarter. As I look at the pre-call consensus numbers that are out there, it looks like the gross margin rate is a little higher than what we're expecting and SG&A is a little lower than what we're expecting based on how we started the quarter. So that's part of the difference there.

As I think about the rest of the year and kind of looking at the numbers out there, everything looks fair to me. As long as we can achieve -- as long as we can achieve those positive comps, I don't see anything in the remainder quarters of the year that indicates concern for me.

Mitch Kummetz -- Pivotal Research Group -- Analyst

And then on the quarter you reported, the merch margin look good on lower markdowns. Is there any concern in terms of risk on seasonal inventory in Q1 given the slow start to the season? I mean, you mentioned -- Ed you mentioned that some of the seasonal product has been slow. I don't know. I mean are people starting to break price, are you concerned about having to start to promote to get that going?

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

I'm not concerned. I mean, where inventory is in great shape even with the sales being a little bit off in those categories, this isn't the first time that we've seen this happen over the years where this -- I think it was last year or two years ago, we had we started off the year like this.

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah 2017 is when we had the torrential rain, especially out here in the West.

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah, and so we had a similar start to the year. And I'm not concerned about what's going to happen with competitors promoting this product and stuff like that. So we're in good shape and the product has a long -- most of the product of seasonal (ph) has a long shelf life. So we should be fine.

Mitch Kummetz -- Pivotal Research Group -- Analyst

Got it. And then lastly, I know you're not giving full your guide, but, Mike, how should we be thinking about leverage points for the year in terms of SG&A fixed cost leverage there and then occupancy on the gross margin line?

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. With things like minimum wage increases that we just absorbed starting January 1, freight costs going up the other portions of e-comm costs that flow through SG&A assuming consistent strong e-comm sales performance. We're looking at needing about a three to keep SG&A relatively stable as a percent of sales.

On the buying, distribution and occupancy costs, it's more of a question mark because it depends on what we're able to negotiate in occupancy line in particular that could help offset some increases in the distribution line that are likely to come from the e-comm shipping and other fulfillment costs relating to e-comm that flows through that particular line. And then of course, depending on where comps lend out, it obviously changes things.

Mitch Kummetz -- Pivotal Research Group -- Analyst

Got it. All right. Thanks, guys. Good luck.

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Operator

Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, there are no further questions in queue at this time. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for closing.

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks again for joining us today, and I'd like to call out and acknowledge the outstanding job that our teams have done during this very difficult retail environment over the last couple of years. We look forward to discussing our first quarter results with you in late May. Have a good evening.

Operator

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude the teleconference for today. You may now disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation and have a wonderful day.

Duration: 34 minutes

Call participants:

Gar Jackson -- Investor Relations

Edmond Thomas -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Michael Henry -- Chief Financial Officer

David M. King -- ROTH Capital Partners -- Analyst

David Buckley -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Jeff Van Sinderen -- B.Riley & Company, Inc. -- Analyst

Mitch Kummetz -- Pivotal Research Group -- Analyst

More TLYS analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Why Pinduoduo Stock Dropped 16.1% Today

What happened

Shares of Pinduoduo (NASDAQ:PDD) -- the company with ambitions to become China's Amazon.com, although it bears more resemblance to a Chinese Groupon -- tumbled in early Wednesday trading and are down 16.1% as of 11:15 a.m. EDT.

The reason: Earnings.

Downward pointing stock chart superimposed on Chinese flag and columns of numbers

Image source: Getty Images.

So what

Expected to lose $0.22 per American depositary share pro forma on revenue of $777.9 million in its fiscal Q4, Pinduoduo ended up selling more stuff -- and losing more money.

Revenue surged nearly fivefold compared to the year-ago quarter, to $822.3 million. Losses on that revenue grew as well, to $0.24 per ADS pro forma, and $0.32 GAAP.

For the full year, Pinduoduo's revenue more than septupled to $1.9 billion, while losses ballooned to $2 per ADS -- 12 times what the company lost in 2017.

Gross merchandise volume (GMV), or the value of all the goods that passed through Pinduoduo's platform from seller to buyer in fiscal 2018, more than tripled to $68.6 billion.

Now what

CEO Zheng Huang called Q4 "a strong finish to 2018," emphasizing the company's growing GMV, "the rapid growth in our annual active buyer base and a near doubling in the annual spending per active buyer."

But here's the problem in a nutshell: Yes, Pinduoduo is getting bigger, faster -- but the more stuff it sells, the more money it loses. At the same time, operating cash flow at the company actually declined 20% year over year in yuan terms, despite the massive ramp in sales, and cash spent on "investing activities," which includes capex, ate up almost every last yuan Pinduoduo generated.

No wonder investors are upset.

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Is Aurora Cannabis the Best Pot Stock to Own Now?

Marijuana stocks might represent a once-in-a-lifetime investing opportunity. This emerging market, after all, is projected to grow its annual sales by over 35% per year for the next five years in a row. What's even more impressive is that some key industry insiders believe that red-hot growth pace may last for upwards of a decade or more -- resulting in a market with sales in excess of $500 billion per year.

Which marijuana stocks are best positioned to take advantage of this rapidly rising tide? While a solid argument can be made that some of the smaller entities might represent the best overall values, the largest producers of cannabis are clearly the safest ways to invest in this risky space. Cowen analyst Vivien Azer, for example, recently pegged Aurora Cannabis (NYSE:ACB) as the firm's top cannabis pick because of its industry-leading 575,000 kilogram peak annual cultivation capacity. 

Close up image of a marijuana flower.

Image Source: Getty Images.

The case for Aurora

Before diving into the details of any specific cannabis-oriented company, it's important to understand the dynamics of this rapidly maturing space. The Cliff's Notes version of the story is that most marijuana companies are likely to fold within the next two years: The Canadian medical and recreational markets are expected to be grossly oversupplied soon, a situation that will lead to brutally low gross profit margins within some of the most popular product categories like dried flowers.   

In that harsh economic environment, peak production capacity will be critical to a cannabis company's ability to survive and develop a viable competitive moat -- for three core reasons:

Large operations come with economies of scale that reduce all-in production costs. As gross profit margins shrink across the industry, cost control will thus be a major competitive advantage.  Companies with top-shelf production outputs can expand more quickly and broadly into derivative cannabis markets, as well as international markets.    Growing large amounts of cannabis, across numerous independently operated facilities, lowers the risks associated with singular crop failures or poor quality control at individual grow sites.  

Where does Aurora Cannabis stand in terms of production capacity relative to the broader field? It's on track to overtake Canopy Growth (NYSE:CGC) as Canada's top cultivator, and after its recent acquisition of ICC Labs, it may be able to produce an astounding 700,000 kilograms per year.

Now, Canopy could decide to ratchet up its production in the wake of  its nearly $4 billion tie-up with beverage-giant Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ)last year. But Aurora will -- at a minimum -- be Canada's second-largest cannabis producer once the dust settles. And that fact alone makes it a fairly safe bet to survive the forthcoming period of oversupply and tighter margins. 

Apart from the company's ability to weather this upcoming storm, Aurora also offers investors several levels of deep value that simply aren't found in most other cannabis stocks. With a footprint in a whopping 24 countries, 11 production facilities in operation, four top-notch recreational brands on the market, multiple subsidiaries that span the entire value chain, and a host of strategic partnerships in place, Aurora is light years ahead most its competitors in terms of business development. 

All told, Aurora has the scale and operational bandwidth to create significant value for its shareholders. 

The case against Aurora

Aurora does have its fair share of drawbacks as a marijuana investing vehicle, however. Here are the three biggest issues in no particular order:

Aurora has not sealed a major partnership with a beverage giant or tobacco titan. Such deals come with obvious financial benefits, but they also dramatically increase a company's access to commercial know-how and regulatory expertise, and strengthen internal controls.  Aurora's hyper-aggressive growth-by-acquisition strategy -- which put it at the forefront of the cannabis space -- has also led to tremendous amounts of shareholder dilution. Without a partner to fund further expansion, more dilution could be coming.  Integrating a diverse range of businesses is a daunting task even under the best of circumstances. As such, there's the real risk that Aurora will fail to capitalize on the latent synergies across its motley assemblage of subsidiaries and strategic partnerships, possibly resulting in a bloated, unprofitable company.

The take-home point is that Aurora does have a number of considerable challenges it will need to overcome in order to realize its full potential as an alpha dog in the cannabis sector.  

Verdict

If your goal is to invest in a relatively safe marijuana stock with reasonable growth prospects, Aurora and Canopy are probably your two best choices. They're poised to dominate the cannabis market in the years to come.

So, the real question boils down to which is the better buy today. On a pure valuation basis, Aurora is the clear winner. At current levels, its shares are trading at about 10 times the company's estimated 2021 sales; Canopy's shares, on the other hand, are presently trading at nearly double that ratio. 

On a risk-assessment basis, though, Aurora simply doesn't compare to Canopy, which has the backing of a major partner in Constellation Brands and a clear path toward sustained profitability as a result. Aurora still needs to figure out how to arrange its various acquisitions into a coherent whole -- a problem that has caused serious headaches for other serial acquirers. 

Bottom line: Canopy may be the more expensive stock by a wide margin, but it also offers a far more transparent investing thesis than Aurora. And there's a lot to be said about knowing what you are investing in -- compared to speculating on what could be in the event that all the stars align. As such, Aurora doesn't appear ready to unseat Canopy as the "best" pot stock to own right now -- and the market seems to agree with this assessment based on their respective valuations. 

Sunday, March 10, 2019

3 Things to Do if You're in Your 50s With No Retirement Savings

There's a reason we're supposed to save independently for retirement: Most seniors need 70% to 80% of their previous income to live comfortably, and Social Security will only provide about half of that for average earners. Without savings, it's pretty tough to fill that gap.

How much savings should you be aiming for? Retirement costs the average American $46,000 a year, but you might need more or less money depending on your expenses and the lifestyle you want to uphold. Social Security, meanwhile, only pays the average senior today about $17,500 a year, so if that's the sort of benefit you're looking at and you have no savings at present, you're facing quite the gap.

Middle-aged man wearing glasses and black sweatshirt with serious expression

IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.

Now if you're in your 20s, 30s, or even 40s, you have a decent window of time to start setting aside some cash for retirement. But if you're already in your 50s, that window is much narrower. Here's what to do if you're facing the latter scenario and want to salvage your golden years.

1. Don't panic

I'm not going to lie -- being in your 50s with no money set aside for the future isn't a great spot to be in, but it's also not totally dire. So rather than panic or resign yourself to an impoverished retirement, make immediate changes that free up cash in your budget. You might downsize your living space, go from a two-car family to a single vehicle, or cut back on luxuries like restaurant meals and non-work clothing. If you're able to free up $500 a month over the next 15 years to save, and your investments generate an average annual 7% return, you'll accumulate about $150,000.

Is that a huge amount of savings to enter retirement with? Honestly, no. But it's better than nothing, and it's a good starting point to aim for.

2. Get a side hustle

You can only cut back on so many living expenses before making yourself miserable. You might make a few meaningful changes that free up several hundred dollars a month, but if you're in your 50s with no savings to show for, you'll need to do better than that.

Enter the side hustle. The beauty of getting a second gig on top of your primary job is that the money you earn from it won't be earmarked for existing expenses, thereby giving you the option to save all of it. In fact, of the millions of Americans who have a side hustle, 14% do so for the express purpose of building retirement savings.

Imagine you're able to bring home $500 a month on top of the $500 you free up by cutting expenses. If you save $1,000 a month for 15 years at an average annual 7% return, you'll have just over $300,000 for retirement. Suddenly, things are looking a lot more promising, aren't they?

3. Make plans to work a bit longer

It's hard to push yourself to stay in the workforce when you've been banking on retiring at a certain age. But extending your career can work wonders for your retirement in several ways. First, if you're able to delay your Social Security benefits past your full retirement age (67 for anyone born in 1960 or later), you'll boost them by 8% a year up until age 70. And that's a good way to compensate for a low savings balance.

Working longer will also afford you an added opportunity to contribute to your retirement plan. Let's imagine that you're saving $1,000 a month, only instead of doing so for 15 years, you do so for 20 years. Suddenly, you're looking at a nest egg of nearly $500,000, assuming the 7% return we've been looking at all along. Now that's a nice chunk of cash.

Remember, Americans are living longer these days, with one in four 65-year-olds expected to live past 90. Extending your career, therefore, won't necessarily leave you without a retirement, but it will give you more money with which to enjoy your golden years once you kick them off.

The last thing you want to do is retire short on cash and struggle as a senior. If you're in your 50s with no retirement savings, pledge to do better effective immediately. The longer you wait, the more you ultimately put your golden years at risk.

Saturday, March 9, 2019

What Happens When Streaming Takes Over Video Games?

Subscription streaming services are starting to look like the future of video games. Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) and Sony (NYSE:SNE) have subscription video game streaming services that work on their consoles. Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) has a streaming service that works on PCs and on its Nvidia Shield TV streaming service. Tech giants Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL), and Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) are all reportedly considering or developing subscription video game streaming services.

Whichever companies end up on top of the subscription video game streaming pile seem sure to be rewarded. But what happens to other stakeholders? Hollywood and record companies have not exactly welcomed the streaming era with open arms. What will streaming do to game developers and publishers like EA (NASDAQ:EA) and Activision (NASDAQ: ATVI)? What will video game subscription rights deals look like? And how will video gaming change for users?

A man plays a video game, holding a controller in his hands and looking at the scene on a television.

Image source: Getty Images.

Signing the deal

One of the most important things to consider about video game streaming services is how the licensing deals will work.

Not all streaming services rely on the same sorts of licensing deals. Netflix and its premium video subscription peers, for instance, have largely relied on exclusive deals and predictable payments. On the music side of things, deals have rarely been exclusive, and royalties are generally tied to usage.

So far, the early arrival of the console giants (Sony and Microsoft) on the video game streaming scene has meant that streaming deals have included exclusives. Generally, the exclusives are the products of the companies' own studios and/or publishers, making them a bit like Netflix-style original content. For instance, Sony's PlayStation Now includes access to The Last of Us, which was developed by Sony's Naughty Dog and published by Sony's Sony Computer Entertainment.

Original content is a vital differentiator for streaming services that also makes them more cost-efficient. And if a company can lock down some of the best content for itself because it is the creator, that's a win. Sony, for instance, published two of the 10 top-selling games of 2018 -- Marvel's Spider-Man and God of War -- and made both PlayStation 4 exclusives.

PlayStation 4 is the clear winner of this current generations of consoles, with more than 91 million units sold, and it has achieved that status in part because of its acclaimed exclusives. Quality exclusives and originals bode well for Sony's PlayStation Now subscription service, and suggest that the streaming future of video games will look at least a little bit like the streaming present of video games and TV, in which exclusive deals and originals loom large.

Video game developers and publishers

The streaming future of video games may be very appealing to Microsoft, Sony, and the other companies that are gearing up to act as middlemen between gamers and developers. But it can't look as good to companies like EA and Activision.

On the bright side, steady long-term revenue from streaming rights deals might allow EA and Activision to rely less on loot boxes and microtransactions, controversial income sources that have allowed them to keep games profitable long after release.

Game developers could also consider a move like the one Disney (NYSE: DIS) is making: Left with lots of movies and TV shows in a space increasingly dominated by streaming services full of original content made in-house, Disney decided to create its own streaming service. In fact, EA is already doing just that: It has a "cloud gaming" service already in the works.

Of course, the console giants may or may not be open to allowing every video game publisher to release streaming apps for their platforms. But ultimately they don't have complete control over video game streaming. Since video game streaming can rely on cloud computing, a user's home hardware does not necessarily have to be as impressive as you might think.

Consoles, streaming devices, and a complicated future

EA has demonstrated its streaming platform (still in development) on smart TVs with cheap wireless controllers. An Amazon streaming service will also use cloud computing to put modern games on less powerful devices, and Google's service, called Project Stream, will reportedly get top-tier games to run in the Chrome web browser. With subscription gaming, the idea of needing big, beefy consoles in the home may become antiquated.

To be sure, there are still advantages to consoles. Netflix users can download movies to their devices for offline viewing, but to do the same with a video game would require console-like hardware. But if internet-connected users can stream desired games in 4K on a cheap Fire TV device, that will change the nature of the video game business.

It is easy to imagine a future in which Microsoft, Sony, and their new competitors sell hardware at cost and become increasingly reliant on cloud solutions.

The cloud's the limit

Microsoft and Sony have captive audiences for their early streaming efforts, but the biggest changes that streaming video games will trigger have yet to come. When cloud computing solutions make leaner hardware gaming-ready, there will be a lot of competition in the video game streaming market and, most likely, consumers will be spending a lot more on monthly subscriptions and a lot less on video game and hardware purchases.

Friday, March 8, 2019

Hot Cheap Stocks For 2019

tags:UNH,EMR,GD,PH,KSS,IBM,

This has been a strange year for Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (NASDAQ:GILD), and investors are right to wonder which stock makes more sense at the moment. Pfizer practically wrote the book on big acquisitions but has recently shifted gears to focus on its own new drug candidates, as its longtime CEO waves goodbye.

Pfizer's moves don't seem nearly as odd as Gilead Sciences' recent decision to sell cheap generic versions of its own branded drugs. The whole pharmaceutical industry hasn't gone crazy, but it's a good time to stack these drugmaker stocks side by side to see which is the better buy right now.

Image source: Getty Images.

The case for Gilead Sciences, Inc.

This company's next-generation antiviral treatments were the first to cure just about anyone with the hepatitis C virus (HCV), but competition with AbbVie has pushed prices so low that Gilead recently launched generic versions of its drugs at discounts around 70% of their initial list prices.

Hot Cheap Stocks For 2019: UnitedHealth Group Incorporated(UNH)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Cory Renauer]

    Rather than pay another PBM for the service, UnitedHealth Group (NYSE:UNH) has been pushing vertical integration for years. America's largest health insurer operates a PBM called Optum, and it's been the third largest behind CVS Health (NYSE:CVS) and Express Scripts for years.

  • [By David Zeiler]

    Last fall, Apple and UnitedHealth Group Inc. (NYSE: UNH) announced the addition of the Apple Watch to UnitedHealth's Motion program. Similar to the Aetna program, it offers an option to earn an Apple Watch by meeting daily walking goals.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    TRADEMARK VIOLATION WARNING: “Investors Buy UnitedHealth Group (UNH) on Weakness” was first posted by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are viewing this article on another site, it was illegally stolen and reposted in violation of United States & international trademark and copyright laws. The original version of this article can be accessed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4119196/investors-buy-unitedhealth-group-unh-on-weakness.html.

Hot Cheap Stocks For 2019: Emerson Electric Company(EMR)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Lee Samaha]

    Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) company Ingersoll-Rand PLC (NYSE:IR) is a better stock to buy than process automation company Emerson Electric (NYSE:EMR), but that doesn't mean the latter isn't also compelling. Both stocks offer strong free cash flow generations, healthy dividend yields, and attractive valuations. Let's take a look at the two businesses, and see just why Ingersoll-Rand edges out its fellow electrical equipment company.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Emerson Electric (NYSE:EMR)‘s stock had its “buy” rating reissued by Cowen in a research note issued on Wednesday. They presently have a $81.00 target price on the industrial products company’s stock. Cowen’s price target points to a potential upside of 3.30% from the company’s current price.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Element Capital Management LLC acquired a new stake in Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) in the 1st quarter, HoldingsChannel.com reports. The fund acquired 202,986 shares of the industrial products company’s stock, valued at approximately $13,864,000.

Hot Cheap Stocks For 2019: S&P GSCI(GD)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Reuben Gregg Brewer]

    Shipbuilding and services specialist Huntington Ingalls (NYSE:HII) was spun off from Northup Grumman in early 2011. General Dynamics (NYSE:GD) is roughly six times larger and offers a far more diversified list of products and services that includes submarines, aircraft, and armored vehicles, among other things. Both, however, provide key products and services to the U.S. military. That's normally a fairly consistent business driven by large and often very long contracts. With a supportive administration in the White House, it would seem like now is a good time to take a look at this pair of stocks. But which of these two military-industrial companies is a better buy? Using a Benjamin Graham lens, the answer may not be what you want to hear.

  • [By Lou Whiteman]

    General Dynamics (NYSE:GD) stock has had an odd couple of years, gaining more than 17% in 2017 but still lagging most of its defense rivals. Interest in defense stocks, including General Dynamics, has ebbed in recent months, but the company still trades at a discount to some of its chief rivals.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on General Dynamics (GD)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Hot Cheap Stocks For 2019: S&P Smallcap 600(PH)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Parker-Hannifin (NYSE:PH) had its price target boosted by Wells Fargo & Co from $185.00 to $193.00 in a research note released on Thursday, The Fly reports. Wells Fargo & Co currently has a market perform rating on the industrial products company’s stock.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Here are some of the news headlines that may have impacted Accern’s analysis:

    Get Parker-Hannifin alerts: Zacks: Brokerages Anticipate Parker-Hannifin Corp (PH) Will Announce Quarterly Sales of $3.53 Billion (americanbankingnews.com) Brokerages Expect Parker-Hannifin Corp (PH) Will Announce Earnings of $2.49 Per Share (americanbankingnews.com) Parker-Hannifin Corp (PH) Receives Consensus Rating of “Hold” from Analysts (americanbankingnews.com) Parker-Hannifin (PH) Stock Rating Upgraded by Evercore ISI (americanbankingnews.com) ASM International Announces Parker Hannifin as First Client Member of ASM's Materials Solutions Network (prweb.com)

    Several research firms recently issued reports on PH. ValuEngine raised Parker-Hannifin from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research note on Tuesday, August 7th. Zacks Investment Research lowered Parker-Hannifin from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating in a research note on Wednesday, June 27th. Wells Fargo & Co reissued a “market perform” rating on shares of Parker-Hannifin in a research note on Thursday, June 28th. MED lowered Parker-Hannifin from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating and set a $169.00 target price on the stock. in a research note on Thursday, July 12th. Finally, Evercore ISI raised Parker-Hannifin from an “in-line” rating to an “outperform” rating in a research note on Monday, August 6th. Eleven analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and seven have issued a buy rating to the stock. Parker-Hannifin presently has an average rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $189.50.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Ardevora Asset Management LLP reduced its stake in shares of Parker Hannifin (NYSE:PH) by 0.5% in the first quarter, HoldingsChannel.com reports. The fund owned 154,400 shares of the industrial products company’s stock after selling 800 shares during the quarter. Ardevora Asset Management LLP’s holdings in Parker Hannifin were worth $26,407,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission.

Hot Cheap Stocks For 2019: Kohl's Corporation(KSS)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By JJ Kinahan]

    It’s all retail all the time this week, with Kohl’s Corporation (NYSE: KSS), Target Corporation (NYSE: TGT), Lowe’s Companies, Inc. (NYSE: LOW), Gap Inc. (NYSE: GPS), Foot Locker, Inc. (NYSE: FL), and Tiffany & Co (NYSE: TIF) among the big names scheduled to report. Last week saw mixed signals from retailers, with Macy’s Inc. (NYSE: M) and Walmart Inc. (NYSE: WMT) both delivering impressive results while J.C. Penney Company Inc. (NYSE: JCP) and Nordstrom, Inc. (NYSE: JWN) received poor reviews from the Street. TGT is arguably the biggest one to watch in the days ahead (see more detail below).

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Chicago Equity Partners LLC reduced its position in shares of Kohl’s Co. (NYSE:KSS) by 11.7% during the fourth quarter, according to the company in its most recent Form 13F filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The firm owned 68,320 shares of the company’s stock after selling 9,055 shares during the period. Chicago Equity Partners LLC’s holdings in Kohl’s were worth $4,532,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Investors bought shares of Kohl’s Co. (NYSE:KSS) on weakness during trading hours on Thursday following insider selling activity. $108.48 million flowed into the stock on the tick-up and $91.31 million flowed out of the stock on the tick-down, for a money net flow of $17.17 million into the stock. Of all stocks tracked, Kohl’s had the 23rd highest net in-flow for the day. Kohl’s traded down ($2.44) for the day and closed at $73.28Specifically, Director Steven A. Burd sold 4,945 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction on Friday, June 8th. The stock was sold at an average price of $76.67, for a total transaction of $379,133.15. The transaction was disclosed in a filing with the SEC, which can be accessed through this hyperlink. Also, insider Richard D. Schepp sold 15,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction on Tuesday, June 12th. The stock was sold at an average price of $78.52, for a total value of $1,177,800.00. Following the sale, the insider now owns 161,050 shares in the company, valued at $12,645,646. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Over the last quarter, insiders have sold 345,311 shares of company stock worth $22,677,767. 1.20% of the stock is owned by company insiders.

  • [By Adam Levine-Weinberg]

    There are good reasons for J.C. Penney to prefer smaller stores. Indeed, Kohl's (NYSE:KSS) -- one of its biggest rivals -- has been shrinking many of its stores, even though most Kohl's locations were already quite a bit smaller than a typical JCPenney. However, it may be much harder for J.C. Penney to shrink stores to its desired size in a productive way than it is for Kohl's.

  • [By Chris Johnson]

    Although several big names have already had their turn in the earnings confessional – including Walmart Inc. (NYSE: WMT), Macy's Inc. (NYSE: M), and Home Depot Inc. (NYSE: HD) – this week has a respectable lineup with the likes of Kohl's Corp. (NYSE: KSS), Lowe's Companies Inc. (NYSE: LOW), and Target Corp. (NYSE: TGT).

Hot Cheap Stocks For 2019: International Business Machines Corporation(IBM)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Paul Ausick]

    The inside track for the contract is believed to be held by Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ: AMZN), which already has a contract to provide classified cloud services with its Amazon Web Services (AWS) to the Central Intelligence Agency. Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOGL), Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ: MSFT), International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE: IBM), Oracle Corp. (NYSE: ORCL) and others are expected to submit bids on the contract. But there have been suggestions that the competition may be rigged.

  • [By Timothy Green]

    International Business Machines' (NYSE:IBM) return to growth after five years of declining revenue has been driven by a few different things. A weakening U.S. dollar has boosted the top line thanks to currency translation effects, the continued double-digit expansion of IBM's growth businesses has offset slumping sales in some legacy businesses, and the launch of the newest z14 mainframe system has provided a boost to the hardware business.

  • [By Money Morning Staff Reports]

    Through Tom's various strategies, followers had the chance to pocket gains of 195.36% in 16 days on Priceline Group Inc. (Nasdaq: PCLN), 193.39% in 16 days on SPDR Gold Trust (ETF) (NYSE Arca: GLD), 100% in eight days on International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE: IBM), and even 248.42% in 17 days on SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF (NYSE Arca: DIA).